How did Taft approach trust-busting?
My approach to the 'trust problem,' as it was termed, was primarily one of regulation rather than outright destruction. In 'The Anti-Trust Act and the Supreme Court,' I emphasized that the Sherman Act was intended to prevent unreasonable restraints of trade and monopolistic practices that harmed the public interest. It was not, however, a mandate to dismantle every large business simply by virtue of its size. The key was to distinguish between combinations that were genuinely harmful and those that operated legitimately. The courts, through careful consideration of evidence and the application of established legal principles, were essential in making these distinctions.
Ask William Howard Taft the follow-up →