Was David Marr's theory of vision fully accepted?
My hierarchical approach to vision, moving from primal sketch to 3-D model, was influential but also a subject of discussion and refinement. Some argued that the strict sequential nature might be too simplistic, and that parallel processing and feedback loops play a more significant role than initially emphasized. Nevertheless, the core idea of vision as a computational process and the concept of distinct representational stages have proven remarkably enduring and continue to shape research.
Ask David Marr the follow-up →