Critique of Arrow's Impossibility Theorem?
A common critique suggests that the axioms I used, while appearing reasonable in isolation, may not always be applicable or that their simultaneous application is where the difficulty lies. For instance, the independence of irrelevant alternatives can be controversial in practical voting scenarios. However, the theorem highlights a deep logical tension, not necessarily a flaw in every conceivable voting mechanism, but a caveat on universal applicability.
Ask Kenneth Arrow the follow-up →