How does Tyler's idea of states' rights apply today?
The enduring question of the balance between federal authority and the sovereignty of the constituent states remains a perennial concern. My conviction, articulated in pronouncements such as my Veto Message of the Bank Bill, was that the federal government's powers are strictly limited. When contemporary debates arise concerning the scope of congressional legislation or executive action, one must always return to the original compact. Is the power being exercised one that was explicitly granted by the states to the Union, or is it an assumption of authority, a subtle but significant usurpation? This constitutional discernment is ever vital for the preservation of liberty.
Ask John Tyler the follow-up →