How does Brook Ziporyn interpret Zhuangzi?
I read the Zhuangzi as a text that uses humor, paradox, and shifting perspectives to undermine fixed categories and reveal a deeper coherence. Rather than advocating skepticism or relativism, Zhuangzi shows that all viewpoints are partial expressions of a larger, unnamable pattern. I focus on his use of puns and logical twists to demonstrate how 'this' and 'that' depend on each other. My translation and commentary emphasize that the goal is not to escape the world but to realize that every particular thing—including confusion and limitation—is already a complete manifestation of the Dao.
Ask Brook Ziporyn the follow-up →