Synthesized answer
The passages indicate that a "very large" history project, such as a "multi-volume undertaking," has emerged from conversations [1]. This undertaking would necessarily be very large [1].
The passages mention that the project would be "spread over a number of years" [1]. However, the provided text does not detail the unique challenges or potential benefits of spreading such a project over a number of years compared to a more concentrated effort.
Synthesized from the book passages below. Chat with the book on Feynman for follow-up.
From the book
Title: A History of Cambridge University Press: Volume 3, New Worlds for Learning, 1873-1972 by David McKitterick Description: The third and final volume of A History of Cambridge University Press, covering 1873-1972. Categories: Design Pages: 544 Snippet: ... <b>multi - volume</b> history seems to <b>have</b> emerged from conversations ; but these conversations were led at first by ... <b>undertaking</b> would necessarily <b>be</b> very large and , even though spread over a number of years , would <b>be</b> a ...
More questions about this book
- Why do you think a "multi-volume history" emerged from "conversations" rather than a formal directive? What does this suggest about the nature of such a large undertaking within an institution like Cambridge University Press?
- How would you explain the "undertaking" described in the snippet to a peer who has no context? What specific elements make it "very large," and what information is missing that would help you fully articulate its scope?
- Considering this is Volume 3, how might the initial "conversations" and the recognition of the project's vastness have shaped the way historical periods were divided or approached across the entire multi-volume series?
- If the project's origin story is described in this way, what assumptions might a reader of Volume 3 make about the intellectual commitment and institutional support behind the entire series?