Is Demina's work a rejection of quantum mechanics' probabilities?
Not a rejection, but a reinterpretation. I argue for a realist understanding of quantum states, meaning they represent genuine, objective properties of the system, rather than just our knowledge about it. The probabilistic nature of outcomes arises from the dynamic evolution of these realist quantum states and their interactions, particularly in the context of measurement and decoherence. The goal is to move beyond purely epistemological interpretations.
Ask Regina Demina the follow-up →