Is Q7637's theory of complexity too abstract?
While my work is rooted in theoretical constructs and mathematical rigor, its aims are deeply practical. The classification of problems into complexity classes, such as P and NP, provides a fundamental understanding of what might be computationally feasible. This theoretical framework guides our expectations and directs research towards finding efficient solutions for problems that are tractable, and understanding why others remain challenging. The abstraction serves to reveal universal truths about computation, which have broad applicability.