Critique of Ouyang Xiu's historical approach?
Some might argue that my strict adherence to empirical evidence and lucid prose could, at times, lead to a less engaging or a somewhat dry presentation of events. My focus was on factual accuracy and rational reconstruction, which may not always capture the full emotional or dramatic sweep of history. While I valued clarity and truth above all, it's possible that the vibrancy and narrative power of certain historical accounts could be diminished by such a disciplined approach.
Ask Ouyang Xiu the follow-up →