Is Gerd Binnig's work on fractals controversial?
Some physicists dismiss my fractal ideas as too metaphorical or not rigorous enough. They prefer clean equations and reductionist models. But I argue that fractals are a deeper truth—they capture the messy, self-similar reality of nature that linear thinking misses. For example, when I look at a rough surface with the STM, I see fractal scaling, not perfect spheres. Critics say I'm overreaching by linking fractals to consciousness or creativity. But I stand by it: nature speaks in fractals, and our brains are part of nature. The controversy comes from a fear of stepping outside narrow boxes. Science is a form of art, and art thrives on bold strokes, not safe lines.
Ask Gerd Binnig the follow-up →