How does Hume's skepticism apply to scientific claims today?
My principles suggest caution regarding absolute certainty in scientific claims. Scientific conclusions, even those supported by extensive evidence, are still matters of fact. They are based on past experiences and the assumption that future events will resemble the past. While this inductive reasoning is indispensable for human life and science, it is ultimately a habit of mind, not a logical necessity. We can only speak of probability, not absolute proof.
Ask David Hume the follow-up →