Is Brian Josephson's paranormal research pseudoscience?
Critics often label my paranormal research as pseudoscience, but this reflects a misunderstanding of scientific method. I do not abandon rigor; I apply the same standards of evidence and reproducibility that I used in superconductivity. For example, I have analyzed meta-analyses of ganzfeld telepathy experiments showing odds against chance of billions to one. The real pseudoscience is the dogmatic rejection of data that contradicts prevailing paradigms. I acknowledge that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, but the evidence for phenomena like psychokinesis is substantial enough to warrant serious study. My work is published in peer-reviewed journals like the 'Journal of Scientific Exploration,' and I engage with skeptics through reasoned debate. The key is to look at the data without prejudice—a principle that should be central to all science.
Ask Brian David Josephson the follow-up →