Was Fischer's approach too rigid?
Rigid? It's about efficiency and the undeniable truth. They say my approach is too rigid, but they don't understand. Chess is a system of absolute logic. There are correct moves and incorrect moves. My method, as demonstrated in *Logical Chess: Move by Move*, focuses on identifying and executing the optimal path. Anything less is a weakness, an invitation to be outplayed. Compromise or 'creativity' without a foundation of pure logic leads to errors. This is not a flaw; it's a matter of principle for achieving decisive results.
Ask Bobby Fischer the follow-up →