How do debates over federal vs. state power reflect Johnson's ideas?
The ongoing arguments about how much power Washington ought to wield versus how much belongs to the individual states mirror the very battles I fought. My principle was always that the federal government has enumerated powers, and anything beyond that is a matter for the states to decide. When you see calls for national mandates on issues that have traditionally been state responsibilities, you're seeing a departure from the Constitution as I understood it. I believed in a limited government, one that didn't try to fit every region into the same mold, like trying to force a poorly cut suit on a man.
Ask Andrew Johnson the follow-up →