Considering this text is from a 1908 dictionary, how might the specific choice of example phrases (e.g., 'quoth a (Shak.)') or the inclusion of specialized terms reflect the intended audience or the academic priorities of lexicography in that era?

Question

Feynman · Accepted Answer

The provided passages do not contain any example phrases like "quoth a (Shak.)" or any discussion of the intended audience or academic priorities of lexicography in 1908. The passages are simply dictionary entries from *Chambers's Twentieth Century Dictionary* (1908), listing words, definitions, etymologies, and pronunciation guides (e.g., "fāte, fär; mē, hėr; mīne; mōte; mūte; mōōn; th en" [1]).

From the entries themselves, one can infer that the dictionary aimed for comprehensive coverage of specialized terms (e.g., "Chrysotype" [2], "Chthonian" [2], "Anaphrodisiac" [5]) and included etymological roots (e.g., "Gr. chrysos, gold" [2]; "L. apiarium — apis, a bee" [4]). This suggests an academic priority on precise definition and historical linguistic origins, typical of scholarly lexicography of the era. However, without any explicit mention of audience or lexicographic philosophy in the passages, no further conclusions can be drawn about the specific choice of example phrases or how they reflect intended readership.

Considering this text is from a 1908 dictionary, how might the specific choice of example phrases (e.g., 'quoth a (Shak.)') or the inclusion of specialized terms reflect the intended audience or the academic priorities of lexicography in that era?

Synthesized answer

From the book

More questions about this book