Synthesized answer
The vicomte calls Napoleon's 18th Brumaire an imposture and a swindle because he believes it was not the conduct of a great man [2]. He questions how Monsieur Pierre explains the 18th Brumaire, stating, "was not that an imposture? It was a swindle, and not at all like the conduct of a great man!" [2].
The vicomte's view suggests that the event did not align with his perception of a truly great man's actions, implying it was deceitful or fraudulent. The passages do not further elaborate on the specific reasons the vicomte considers it a swindle beyond this initial assertion.
Synthesized from the book passages below. Chat with the book on Feynman for follow-up.
From the book
to commit murder he had restored it to the rightful king, I should have called him a great man,” remarked the vicomte. “He could not do that. The people only gave him power that he might rid them of the Bourbons and because they saw that he was a great man. The Revolution was a grand thing!” continued Monsieur Pierre, betraying by this desperate and provocative proposition his extreme youth and his wish to express all that was in his mind. “What? Revolution and regicide a grand thing?... Well, after that... But won’t you come to this other table?” repeated Anna Pávlovna. “Rousseau’s…
that it was impossible to stop him, she rallied her forces and joined the vicomte in a vigorous attack on the orator. “But, my dear Monsieur Pierre,” said she, “how do you explain the fact of a great man executing a duc—or even an ordinary man who—is innocent and untried?” “I should like,” said the vicomte, “to ask how monsieur explains the 18th Brumaire; was not that an imposture? It was a swindle, and not at all like the conduct of a great man!” “And the prisoners he killed in Africa? That was horrible!” said the little princess, shrugging her shoulders. “He’s a low fellow, say…
sked him to do it. “Bâton de gueules, engrêlé de gueules d’azur—maison Condé,” said he. The princess listened, smiling. “If Buonaparte remains on the throne of France a year longer,” the vicomte continued, with the air of a man who, in a matter with which he is better acquainted than anyone else, does not listen to others but follows the current of his own thoughts, “things will have gone too far. By intrigues, violence, exile, and executions, French society—I mean good French society—will have been forever destroyed, and then....” He shrugged his shoulders and spread out his hands.…
gicide,” again interjected an ironical voice. “Those were extremes, no doubt, but they are not what is most important. What is important are the rights of man, emancipation from prejudices, and equality of citizenship, and all these ideas Napoleon has retained in full force.” “Liberty and equality,” said the vicomte contemptuously, as if at last deciding seriously to prove to this youth how foolish his words were, “high-sounding words which have long been discredited. Who does not love liberty and equality? Even our Saviour preached liberty and equality. Have people since the…
tainly throw itself into the arms of its rightful king,” she concluded, trying to be amiable to the royalist emigrant. “That is doubtful,” said Prince Andrew. “Monsieur le Vicomte quite rightly supposes that matters have already gone too far. I think it will be difficult to return to the old regime.” “From what I have heard,” said Pierre, blushing and breaking into the conversation, “almost all the aristocracy has already gone over to Bonaparte’s side.” “It is the Buonapartists who say that,” replied the vicomte without looking at Pierre. “At the present time it is difficult to…