Synthesized answer
The passages indicate that Thomson, Dyer, and Ramsay wrote "verse instinct with a fresh sense of outward Nature which was hardly to be found in other writers of that day" [4], while Shenstone's "sense of Nature, although true, was mixed with the conventions of his time" [1]. This contrast suggests an evolving relationship where some poets broke free from artificial conventions to present nature directly, while Shenstone remained partially bound by contemporary tastes—for example, he asked a noble friend to "open a waterfall in the garden" [1], treating nature as something to be shaped and displayed rather than simply observed.
The deeper implication is that the era saw a tension between a "fresh" unmediated appreciation of nature and a more conventional, cultivated approach. Thomson's blank verse is praised as "original" and "without imitation," looking "round on Nature and on Life with the eye which Nature bestows only on a poet" [3], implying a direct, personal vision. Shenstone, by contrast, mixed true feeling with the conventions of his time, suggesting that even poets who genuinely loved nature could not fully escape the artificial garden-making and aesthetic fashions of…
Synthesized from the book passages below. Chat with the book on Feynman for follow-up.
From the book
ares with Thomson the curiosity of critics who would decide which of them wrote “Rule Britannia”—was of Thomson’s age. The other writers of whose lives Johnson here gives his note were men born in the beginning of the eighteenth century: Gilbert West, the translator of Pindar, in 1706; George Lyttelton, in 1709. William Shenstone, whose sense of Nature, although true, was mixed with the conventions of his time, and who once asked a noble friend to open a waterfall in the garden upon which the poet spent his little patrimony, was born in 1714; Thomas Gray, in 1716; William Collins, in…
er, however willing to be pleased. Let me, however, honestly report whatever may counterbalance this weight of censure. I have been told that Akenside, who, upon a poetical question, has a right to be heard, said, “That he would regulate his opinion of the reigning taste by the fate of Dyer’s ‘Fleece;’ for, if that were ill-received, he should not think it any longer reasonable to expect fame from excellence.” SHENSTONE. WILLIAM SHENSTONE, the son of Thomas Shenstone and Anne Pen, was born in November, 1714, at the Leasowes in Hales-Owen, one of those insulated districts…
iendship, and his adherence to his first acquaintance when the advancement of his reputation had left them behind him. As a writer, he is entitled to one praise of the highest kind: his mode of thinking and of expressing his thoughts is original. His blank verse is no more the blank verse of Milton, or of any other poet, than the rhymes of Prior are the rhymes of Cowley. His numbers, his pauses, his diction, are of his own growth, without transcription, without imitation. He thinks in a peculiar train, and he thinks always as a man of genius; he looks round on Nature and on Life with…
Nicholas Rowe the dramatist, who was also the first editor of Shakespeare’s plays after the four folios had appeared. Ambrose Philips and Rowe were born in 1671 and 1673, and Isaac Watts in 1674. Thomas Parnell, born in 1679, would follow next, nearly of like age with Young, whose birth-year was 1681. Pope’s friend John Gay was of Pope’s age, born in 1688, two years later than Addison’s friend Thomas Tickell, who was born in 1686. Next in the course of years came, in 1692, William Somerville, the author of “The Chace.” John Dyer, who wrote “Grongar Hill,” and James Thomson,…
the envy of the great and the admiration of the skilful; a place to be visited by travellers and copied by designers. Whether to plant a walk in undulating curves, and to place a bench at every turn where there is an object to catch the view, to make the water run where it will be heard, and to stagnate where it will be seen, to leave intervals where the eye will be pleased, and to thicken the plantation where there is something to be hidden, demands any great powers of mind, I will not inquire: perhaps a sullen and surly spectator may think such performances rather the sport than the…
More questions about this book
- The introduction notes that only Edward Young's life is "treated at length" in this volume. What might this editorial decision suggest about Johnson's criteria for assessing poets, or the broader purpose of his "Lives" series?
- How does the chronological arrangement and brief descriptions of various poets, from Garth to Akenside, help us trace potential shifts or continuities in literary trends and poetic concerns from the late 17th to the mid-18th century?
- Beyond listing poets, the introduction sprinkles specific details like Nicholas Rowe being Shakespeare's first editor, or the critical debate around "Rule Britannia." What does the inclusion of such details suggest about the multifaceted scope and intellectual curiosity present in Johnson's original biographical project?
- Imagine you are explaining this introduction to someone completely unfamiliar with Samuel Johnson. How would you simplify the essential information provided here, and what two or three critical insights about Johnson's work or the period would you highlight to help them grasp its significance?