Synthesized answer
The provided passages do not contain information about the historical context of the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica's publication and how it might influence the interpretation or emphasis on the events of the "Alabama" Arbitration. Therefore, a detailed answer to this question cannot be provided based solely on the given text.
However, the passages do highlight the significance of the "Alabama" Arbitration as "one of those arbitrations on pecuniary claims" and note that "The case is important, both from a historical and a juridical point of view, and affords a conspicuous example of the value of arbitration as a means of averting war" [1]. The text also details the grievances of the United States against Great Britain concerning the building and equipping of Confederate vessels, such as the "Alabama," on British territory, and the subsequent process of submitting these claims to arbitration through the Treaty of Washington [2, 4].
Synthesized from the book passages below. Chat with the book on Feynman for follow-up.
From the book
← Alabama 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica , Volume 1 "Alabama" Arbitration by Montague Hughes Crackanthorpe Alabama River → See also Alabama Claims on Wikipedia ; and our 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica disclaimer . 244259 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica , Volume 1 — "Alabama" Arbitration Montague Hughes Crackanthorpe “ALABAMA” ARBITRATION. —This is one of those arbitrations on pecuniary claims, made by one state, on behalf of its subjects, against another state, which are referred to in the article Arbitration, International . The case is important, both from a historical and a juridical point of…
rpool in two British ships. Captain Semmes there took command of her under a commission from the Confederate government. After a most destructive career she was sunk off Cherbourg by the “Kearsarge” on the 19th of June 1864. On these facts the United States government alleged against Great Britain two grievances, or sets of grievances. The first was the recognition of the Southern States as belligerents and a general manifestation of unfriendliness in other ways. The second was in respect of breaches of neutrality in allowing the “Alabama,” the “Florida” (originally the “Oreto”, the…
. With respect to the “Alabama” claims the British commissioners suggested that they should be submitted to arbitration. The American commissioners refused “unless the principles which should govern the arbitrators in the consideration of the facts could be first agreed upon.” After some discussion the British commissioners consented that the three following rules should apply.
d waters, and as to all persons within its jurisdiction to prevent any violation of the foregoing obligation and duties. The arrangements made by the commission were embodied in the treaty of Washington, which was signed on the 8th of May 1871, and approved by the Senate on the 24th of May. Article 1, after expressing the regret felt by Her Majesty’s government for the escape, in whatever circumstances, of the “Alabama” and other vessels from British ports, and for the depredations committed by these vessels, provided that “the claims growing out of the acts of the said vessels, and…
nfriendly utterances of British politicians and the material assistance afforded to the Confederates by British traders. The inclusion of the indirect losses and the other matters just referred to caused great excitement in England. That they were within the treaty was disputed, and it was argued that, if they were, the treaty should be amended or denounced. In October 1872 Lord Granville notified to General Schenck, the United States minister, that the British government did not consider that the indirect losses were within the submission, and in April the British counter-case was filed…
More questions about this book
- How did the British government's proclamation of neutrality, despite its stated intent, directly contribute to the "Alabama" Arbitration becoming a "conspicuous example of the value of arbitration as a means of averting war"?
- Explain the legal and practical challenges faced by the British authorities in deciding whether to detain the "Alabama," considering their declared neutrality and the evidence presented by the US consul.
- If you were explaining the "Alabama" Arbitration to someone unfamiliar with it, how would you simplify the connection between the Confederates' arms procurement strategy in England and the eventual international dispute?
- Beyond the immediate historical context, what fundamental principles of international law or state responsibility, illustrated by this case, are still relevant in today's global landscape, and why?