Synthesized answer
The provided passages do not contain information about what questions remain unanswered. They primarily cite works by Kahneman and Tversky and discuss Daniel M. Hausman's book on preferences, value, choice, and welfare [1, 2]. The passages mention that Hausman argues for further development of theories of preference formation and criticizes attempts to define welfare in terms of preferences or preferences in terms of choices or self-interest [2]. However, they do not specify any remaining unanswered questions.
Synthesized from the book passages below. Chat with the book on Feynman for follow-up.
From the book
ess & Economics Pages: 169 Snippet: ... <b>Kahneman</b> and Tversky , eds . , pp . 693-708 . 2000b . " Experienced Utility and Objective Happiness : A Moment ... <b>Amos Tversky</b> . 1979. “ Prospect Theory . ” Econometrica 47 : 263-91 . <b>Kahneman</b> , Daniel and <b>Amos Tversky</b> , eds ...
Title: Preference, Value, Choice, and Welfare by Daniel M. Hausman Description: This book is about preferences, principally as they figure in economics. It also explores their uses in everyday language and action, how they are understood in psychology and how they figure in philosophical reflection on action and morality. The book clarifies and for the most part defends the way in which economists invoke preferences to explain, predict and assess behavior and outcomes. Hausman argues, however, that the predictions and explanations economists offer rely on theories of preference formation…