Synthesized answer
The passages explain that the transcriber’s notes correct a few typographical errors and preserve original spelling and punctuation in quoted material [1]. They also detail that a macron over "m" (e.g., "co[=m]ander") is a shortcut for a double "m" [1]. Understanding these editorial choices is crucial because they reveal how the transcriber has handled ambiguities in the original text. For a scholar, knowing that macrons represent abbreviations and that errors are explicitly listed allows one to distinguish between the original document’s conventions and the transcriber’s interventions, thereby assessing the text’s fidelity.
Such details directly influence confidence in the text’s accuracy. The notes state that all typographical errors are “minor” and that spelling and punctuation in quoted material are left as in the original [1]. This transparency assures the reader that no substantive changes were made without notice, and that the transcriber aimed to preserve the historical character of the document. Without this information, a reader might misinterpret a macron as a typo or assume modern standardization, reducing trust in the edition.
However, the passages do not discuss…
Synthesized from the book passages below. Chat with the book on Feynman for follow-up.
From the book
← The Frontier in American History ( 1921 ) by Frederick Jackson Turner → information about this edition From the "Transcriber's notes" from Project Gutenberg : A few typographical errors have been corrected. . . the original has the words "co[=m]ander" and "su[=m]e". [=m] represents the letter m with a macron. It is a shortcut indicating that the word should have two m's in succession. . . Ellipses are represented as in the original. . . Spelling and punctuation errors in quoted material have been left as in the original. For a full list of typographical errors, all of which are minor, see…
k of the National Herbart Society , and in various other publications. ↑ "Abridgment of Debates of Congress," v, p. 706. ↑ Bancroft (1860 ed.), iii, pp. 344, 345, citing Logan MSS.; [Mitchell] "Contest in America," etc. (1752), p. 237. ↑ Kercheval, "History of the Valley"; Bernheim, "German Settlements in the Carolinas"; Winsor, "Narrative and Critical History of America," v, p. 304; Colonial Records of North Carolina, iv, p. xx; Weston, "Documents Connected with the History of South Carolina," p. 82; Ellis and Evans, "History of Lancaster County, Pa.," chs. iii, xxvi. ↑ Parkman, "Pontiac,"…
Here the minister's hand is probably absent: 1 That wharas by the all dessposing hand of god who orders all things in infinit wisdom it is our portion to liue In such a part of the land which by reson of the enemy Is becom vary dangras as by wofull experiants we haue falt both formarly and of late to our grat damidg & discoridgment and espashaly this last yere hauing lost so many parsons som killed som captauated and som remoued and allso much corn & cattell and horses & hay wharby wee ar gratly Impouerrished and brought uary low & in a uary pore capasity to subsist any longer As the barers…
history. Footnotes edit ↑ A paper read at the meeting of the American Historical Association in Chicago, July 12, 1893. It first appeared in the Proceedings of the State Historical Society of Wisconsin, December 14, 1893, with the following note: "The foundation of this paper is my article entitled 'Problems in American History,' which appeared in The Ægis , a publication of the students of the University of Wisconsin, November 4, 1892. . . . It is gratifying to find that Professor Woodrow Wilson—whose volume on 'Division and Reunion' in the Epochs of American History Series, has an…
ion, because the weaker the minority becomes, the greater will their need for power be according to their own doctrines. Leigh of Chesterfield county declared: It is remarkable—I mention it for the curiosity of the fact—that if any evil, physical or moral, arise in any of the states south of us, it never takes a northerly direction, or taints the Southern breeze; whereas, if any plague originate in the North, it is sure to spread to the South and to invade us sooner or later; the influenza—the smallpox—the varioloid—the Hessian fly—the Circuit Court system—Universal Suffrage—all come from the…
More questions about this book
- The text introduces Herbert Hoover's "American Individualism" before detailing Frederick Jackson Turner's "The Frontier in American History." How might the juxtaposition of these two titles suggest a broader intellectual or historical context the compiler wants the reader to consider, even though Hoover's text itself is absent?
- Turner's "Frontier Thesis" is identified as "seminal" and prompted by the 1890 census stating the country no longer had a frontier of settlement. How would you explain to someone unfamiliar with this idea why the apparent disappearance of a geographical frontier was considered such a profoundly significant turning point for American identity and development?
- Examine the chapter titles listed for "The Frontier in American History," such as "The Old West," "Contributions of the West to American Democracy," and "Social Forces in American History." What overarching argument or conceptual framework about the frontier's influence on American society does this structure suggest Turner is trying to build?
- Turner's essay, first published in 1893, later became Chapter I of his 1921 book. What does this decision to incorporate and position the essay as the initial chapter suggest about its foundational importance to Turner's overarching historical perspective and its enduring relevance within the field?