Synthesized answer
The "Alabama" was being built at Messrs. Laird in Birkenhead in June 1862, nearly completed and obviously intended as a man-of-war [2]. On June 23rd, Mr. C. F. Adams forwarded a letter from the United States consul at Liverpool containing particulars about the vessel to Earl Russell [2]. This letter was presented to the law officers, who advised that the vessel ought to be detained if the particulars were correct [2]. Sworn evidence was obtained and laid before the commissioners of customs, the proper authorities for enforcing the Foreign Enlistment Act of 1819, on July 21st and supplemented on July 23rd, but they declined to take action [1]. The same evidence was again presented to the law officers on July 23rd, who advised there was sufficient ground for detention [1].
However, due to an unexplained accident, possibly related to the severe illness of Sir John Harding, the queen’s advocate, the papers were not returned until July 29th [1]. By then, the vessel had already sailed on the evening of July 28th [1]. Although it remained off the coast of Anglesey for two days, no serious attempt was made to pursue it [1]. The "Alabama" then proceeded to the Azores, where it received…
Synthesized from the book passages below. Chat with the book on Feynman for follow-up.
From the book
was laid before the law officers, who advised that, if these particulars were correct, the vessel ought to be detained. On the 21st of July sworn evidence, which was supplemented on the 23rd of July, was obtained and laid before the commissioners of customs (who were the proper authorities to enforce the provisions of the Foreign Enlistment Act of 1819), but they declined to move. On the 23rd of July the same evidence was laid before the law officers, who advised that there was sufficient ground for detention. By some accident, which has never been satisfactorily explained, but was probably…
tes on the 13th of April 1861. On the 19th of April President Abraham Lincoln declared a blockade of the southern ports. On the 14th of May the British government issued a proclamation of neutrality, by which the Confederates were recognized as belligerents. This example was followed shortly afterwards by France and other nations. The blockade of the southern ports was not at first effective, and blockade-running soon became an active industry. The Confederates established agencies in England for the purchase of arms, which they despatched in ordinary merchant vessels to the Bahamas, whence…
rpool in two British ships. Captain Semmes there took command of her under a commission from the Confederate government. After a most destructive career she was sunk off Cherbourg by the “Kearsarge” on the 19th of June 1864. On these facts the United States government alleged against Great Britain two grievances, or sets of grievances. The first was the recognition of the Southern States as belligerents and a general manifestation of unfriendliness in other ways. The second was in respect of breaches of neutrality in allowing the “Alabama,” the “Florida” (originally the “Oreto”, the…
ontended that it must be a diligence commensurate with the emergency or with the magnitude of the results of negligence. The British government maintained that while the measure of care which a government is bound to use in such cases must be dependent more or less upon circumstances, it would be unreasonable to require that it should exceed that which the governments of civilized states were accustomed to employ in matters concerning their own security or that of their citizens. The tribunal adopted the view suggested by the United States. It found that Great Britain was legally responsible…
d waters, and as to all persons within its jurisdiction to prevent any violation of the foregoing obligation and duties. The arrangements made by the commission were embodied in the treaty of Washington, which was signed on the 8th of May 1871, and approved by the Senate on the 24th of May. Article 1, after expressing the regret felt by Her Majesty’s government for the escape, in whatever circumstances, of the “Alabama” and other vessels from British ports, and for the depredations committed by these vessels, provided that “the claims growing out of the acts of the said vessels, and…
More questions about this book
- How did the British government's "proclamation of neutrality" and its recognition of the Confederates as "belligerents" paradoxically contribute to the dispute over the CSS Alabama, and what specific challenge did this pose for the concept of neutrality?
- Beyond simply acquiring a warship, what were the strategic and logistical advantages for the Confederates in establishing "agencies in England for the purchase of arms" and transhipping them via the Bahamas, rather than direct shipments?
- The text states the case "affords a conspicuous example of the value of arbitration as a means of averting war." Based *only* on the described events, what specific elements of the "Alabama" incident demonstrate its potential to escalate into a larger conflict between states?
- If you were to explain the core grievance of the United States against Great Britain regarding the "Alabama" to someone completely unfamiliar with the American Civil War, how would you simplify the facts presented here to make the legal and historical importance clear?