Synthesized answer
Distributing a modified version of this document under the GFDL would require careful adherence to its terms, particularly regarding image usage. All images must be included verbatim when the document is copied, distributed, or modified [3]. This means that any changes made to the document cannot alter the original images.
The GFDL permits copying and distribution in any medium, provided the resulting work carries the same license [1]. It also allows for modification of the document, but without the option for the author to restrict certain modifications or reject modifications that might result in a competitive product [1]. While the passages state that all images must be included verbatim, they do not provide specific details on how to handle situations where the *content* of an image might be problematic or require alteration for the modified work, beyond simply including it as is. The GFDL aims to grant users freedom to exchange and copy the book's content [4].
Synthesized from the book passages below. Chat with the book on Feynman for follow-up.
From the book
permits the copying and distribution of a document in any medium, provided the resulting work carries the same license. It also permits the modification of a document provided certain conditions. Unlike the OPL, however, it does not give authors the option to restrict certain modifications. It also does not give authors the right to reject modifications that might result in a competitive book product. It does require certain forms of front- and back-cover information if a party other than the copyright holder wishes to publish more than 100 copies of a protected work, however. In the course…
t complete and with the help of the GFDL, others will feel a similar urge to add their own perspective to that portrait. Endnotes edit See "Freedom—Or Copyright?" (May, 2000) http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/stallman0500.asp . See "Safari Tech Books Online; Subscriber Agreement: Terms of Service." http://safari.oreilly.com/mainhlp.asp?help=service See "The Open Publication License: Draft v1.0" (June 8, 1999). http://opencontent.org/openpub/ See "The GNU Free Documentation License: Version 1.1" (March, 2000). http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html See…
m Ogden/Photo Researchers, Inc. and cannot be used without permission. St. Ignucius photograph © Wouter van Oortmerssen. Printed in the United States of America. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with the Invariant Sections being no invariant sections, with the Front-Cover Texts being no invariant sections, and with the Back-Cover Texts being no invariant sections. A copy of the license is included in Appendix C, GNU Free…
d, Stallman noted, since it minimized the risk of the nonselected options popping up in modified versions of a document. The importance of modification in both licenses was a reflection of their original purpose—namely, to give software-manual owners a chance to improve their manuals and publicize those improvements to the rest of the community. Since my book wasn't a manual, I had little concern about the modification clause in either license. My only concern was giving users the freedom to exchange copies of the book or make copies of the content, the same freedom they would have enjoyed if…
ompatible license. "Content available only under GFDL is not permissible" (§7.4). This does not apply to non-text media. Public domain Public domain false false
More questions about this book
- Explain the fundamental "freedom" this document's license grants to a user, differentiating it from typical book copyrights.
- If you were to adapt this document, what specific obligations would you need to fulfill to comply with the GNU Free Documentation License, and why are these obligations important to the license's philosophy?
- The license explicitly states "no invariant sections." How does the absence of invariant sections enhance or diminish the "freedom" of the document, and for whom?
- Considering the book's title, "Free as in Freedom," how does the detailed GFDL licensing information in this excerpt directly manifest the core principles of the free software movement?